On Sun, Jun 25 2000, Paolo Zeppegno wrote:
> Rereading my posting I understand I did not make myself clear.
>
> What I'm saying is that to be able to use ide-scsi with 2.4 it MUST be
> compiled in, whereas in 2.2 it worked fine as a module. I'm not talking
> about the difference in name (ide-scsi vs. scsi).
>
> If you look at the source code in ide.c in 2.4 test2:
>
> case -14: /* "scsi" */
> #if defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDESCSI) && defined(CONFIG_SCSI)
> drive->scsi = 1;
> goto done;
> #else
> drive->scsi = 0;
> goto bad_option;
> #endif /* defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDESCSI) && defined(CONFIG_SCSI) */
Ah right, could you apply the obvious (remove the #if defined as requried)
and verify that it then works as expected?
Andre, lets remove that. It makes sense to be able to skip a drive and
let ide-scsi claim it, also for a modular setup.
-- * Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> * SuSE Labs- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 21:00:06 EST