Re: owner field in `struct fs'

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Mon Jun 26 2000 - 15:18:49 EST

Next message: George Anzinger: "Re: Linux scheduler and goodness calculation"
Previous message: David Woodhouse: "Re: owner field in `struct fs'"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: owner field in `struct fs'"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: owner field in `struct fs'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:

> Erm... There is one case when MOD_INC_USE_COUNT is kosher and even needed,
> but it's pretty convoluted. Consider modules A, B and C.
> A provides register_foo() and unregister_foo()
> B provides foo1
> C does register_foo(&foo1) and unregister_foo(&foo1) for ioctls on
> some device.

Upon rereading - you have a sicker mind than I'd previously thought, and
I'm not 100% convinced my own code handles that correctly. I'll check.

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: George Anzinger: "Re: Linux scheduler and goodness calculation"
Previous message: David Woodhouse: "Re: owner field in `struct fs'"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: owner field in `struct fs'"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: owner field in `struct fs'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 21:00:09 EST