Re: OOM?

From: Adam Heath (adam@doogie.org)
Date: Mon Jun 26 2000 - 19:47:42 EST


On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Adam Heath wrote:
>
> >VM: do_try_to_free_pages: procmail (or something very close)
>
> likely to be:
>
> VM: killing ...

Nope, that it wasn't. I wasn't sure about the 2nd :. There was definately no
killing word anywhere in the message.

It wasn't flooding the console, but it was a little faster than every second.

> There was a potential oom deadlock in getblk that is been fixed in 2.2.16.
> I just hope you hit that one. Spawning kdb and getting stack traces for
> the stuck tasks is very handy for debugging such cases.

The machine runs 2.2.16. Are you saying the bug was fixed in .16, or it
exists in .16?

Running kdb on a dead machine(I couldn't even connect to it over a directly
connected serial port) is kinda difficult.

----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL++++ P+ L++++ !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
----BEGIN PGP INFO----
Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E 63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-----END PGP INFO-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 21:00:10 EST