It can but you are doing RAID, so you have other issues.
Regardless of hardware/software RAID.
I am dealing with single drives at this point.
Cheers,
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Thomas Davis wrote:
> Andre Hedrick wrote:
> >
> > All I want is a faster way to do fsck!
> > 40,60,75,100 GB fscking sucks.........I goto lunch for an hour if a 60GB
> > drive or larger is being wacked upon.
> >
>
> Try 500GB. That's right. Large. Big.
>
> Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/rza1 146144 56684 81916 41% /
> /dev/rza3 511858304 61405604 424845604 13% /export/data
>
> Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
> /dev/rza1 37760 7029 30731 19% /
> /dev/rza3 2000896 303012 1697884 15% /export/data
>
> These crash, and it's a minimum of 3 hours waiting.
>
> Thankfully, there's serial consoles.
>
> And to think we are looking at terabyte systems in the next 60days..
> (that's right, 1 terabyte of disk, off of one system. I'm not 100%
> positive if Linux can handle a terabyte file system..)
>
> --
> ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
> Thomas Davis | PDSF Project Leader
> tadavis@lbl.gov |
> (510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?"
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Andre Hedrick
The Linux ATA/IDE guy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 07 2000 - 21:00:17 EST