Re: BK performance tip (22x faster)

From: Larry McVoy (lm@bitmover.com)
Date: Wed Jul 05 2000 - 18:01:55 EST


On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 11:28:08PM +0100, Alex Buell wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Richard Gooch wrote:
>
> > > 2.3/4 kernels use a SLAB cache for inodes, instead of an ad hoc
> > > cache. the old limit was used to determine when to reap inodes.
> > > the new system reaps them automatically when system memory is short.
> >
> > Good. That's what I was hoping for.
>
> Does this means buffer cache corruption causing Linux 2.2.x to lose its
> lunch are a thing of the past? 'Cause I've just had my machine die twice
> in the last two days due to this thing!
>
> I'd love to see self-correcting software ECC for caches.

Hmm. BK has a sort of lame checksum that it uses for integrity and we
used to see checksum failures frequently until I stopped buying memory
without ECC. This same lame checksum was what found the cache aliasing
bug in SPARC/Linux.

At any rate, I have been using 2.2.15-pre9 for months without any errors
so are you sure that it is buffer cache corruption and not bad memory
dimms? If you are sure, I want to know.

-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	   lm@bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 07 2000 - 21:00:17 EST