Hi Chris,
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 02:30:20PM -0700, Thomas Davis wrote:
>
> Try 500GB. That's right. Large. Big.
>
> Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/rza1 146144 56684 81916 41% /
> /dev/rza3 511858304 61405604 424845604 13% /export/data
>
> Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
> /dev/rza1 37760 7029 30731 19% /
> /dev/rza3 2000896 303012 1697884 15% /export/data
>
> These crash, and it's a minimum of 3 hours waiting.
>
> Any idea how long it will take if the disks were 'full' -- I ask this
> beaks I'm thinking about an applicator in the next couple on months
> where I would have multiple 400GB raid-arrays, mostly full with small
> (<10M> files.
>
> Because if the high fsck times, I was thinking maybe I would make
> many many 50GB filesystems instead, but it's a pain to manage.
Why not use Reiserfs? I think journaling is a must with disks that
large, and reiserfs is faster dan ext2 if you have a lot of files/dirs
in a directory.
Ookhoi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST