Re: Kernel 2.2.14 OOM killer strikes.

From: Derek Martin (derek@cerberus.ne.mediaone.net)
Date: Fri Jul 07 2000 - 19:14:27 EST


Today, Chris Meadors gleaned this insight:

> I only have one question about this scheme. What about a program that
> leaks very slowly over a long period of time? (Wasn't there even a kernel
> leak like that in the early 2.2.x series?) It will eventually end up
> exausting all memory and surely there'll be another program asking for
> memory faster than it as you head the OOM situation.
>
> I know, I know, this is a rare case and the program doing that should be
> fixed. But it is something to think about. Perhaps there'll be a new
> class of attacks, ones that take weeks or months to pull off.

I don't have ALL the answers man, I'm just a sysadmin... ;)

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Derek D. Martin              |  Unix/Linux Geek
ddm@MissionCriticalLinux.com |  derek@cerberus.ne.mediaone.net
---------------------------------------------------------------

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 07 2000 - 21:00:22 EST