Secret patches (was Re: Patch: 2.4.0-test3 still had some current->priority references)

From: Andrew Morton (andrewm@uow.edu.au)
Date: Tue Jul 11 2000 - 03:39:48 EST

Next message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: linux-2.4.0 breaks grub install into partition"
Previous message: Borislav Deianov: "[patch] fairsched-0.44"
In reply to: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: Patch: 2.4.0-test3 still had some current->priority references"
Next in thread: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: Secret patches (was Re: Patch: 2.4.0-test3 still had some current->priority references)"
Reply: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: Secret patches (was Re: Patch: 2.4.0-test3 still had some current->priority references)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Albert D. Cahalan" wrote:
>
> It sure would be nice to have seen the original change mentioned
> on linux-kernel for all to see.

Agreed. There is too much of this. Peer review is evaded and nobody
knows who is doing what to which and why. Nor, indeed, whether they are
doing it right.

What _advantage_ is there in not Cc'ing this list on patches?

Please, guys. Do us the courtesy.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: linux-2.4.0 breaks grub install into partition"
Previous message: Borislav Deianov: "[patch] fairsched-0.44"
In reply to: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: Patch: 2.4.0-test3 still had some current->priority references"
Next in thread: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: Secret patches (was Re: Patch: 2.4.0-test3 still had some current->priority references)"
Reply: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: Secret patches (was Re: Patch: 2.4.0-test3 still had some current->priority references)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:12 EST