Re: That didn't last long - 2.4.0-test3

From: Ralf Baechle (ralf@uni-koblenz.de)
Date: Mon Jul 10 2000 - 22:52:23 EST


On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 09:19:47PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:

> Just heard about 2.4.0test3. Just snagged it off kernel.org
> and promptly got hit by this trying to upgrade from test2 to test3.
>
> -D__KERNEL__ -I/mnt1/src/linux-2.4.0test3/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -march=i586 -fno-strict-aliasing -c -o timer.o timer.c
> timer.c: In function `update_process_times':
> timer.c:580: structure has no member named `priority'
> timer.c:580: `DEF_PRIORITY' undeclared (first use in this function)
> timer.c:580: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> timer.c:580: for each function it appears in.)
> make[2]: *** [timer.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt1/src/linux-2.4.0test3/kernel'
> make[1]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt1/src/linux-2.4.0test3/kernel'
> make: *** [_dir_kernel] Error 2
> [root@alcove linux]#
>
> Sigh...
>
> X86, uniprocessor.

Either compile a SMP kernel or use the patch below.

  Ralf

--- linux-2.4.0-test3-pre8/kernel/timer.c Mon Jul 10 23:19:48 2000
+++ lw/kernel/timer.c Tue Jul 11 03:07:20 2000
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@
                         p->counter = 0;
                         p->need_resched = 1;
                 }
- if (p->priority < DEF_PRIORITY)
+ if (p->nice < 0)
                         kstat.cpu_nice += user_tick;
                 else
                         kstat.cpu_user += user_tick;

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:13 EST