Re: ReiserFS patch for 2.4.0-test2

From: Chris Mason (mason@suse.com)
Date: Thu Jul 13 2000 - 08:26:06 EST


On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Martin Josefsson wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
> > The 2.4 series is slower than the 2.2 series for FS usage regardless of whether
> > ext2 or reiserfs. The slowness is believed to not be a reiserfs feature but to
> > be due to the upper layers above reiserfs. There might be some benefit to their
> > becoming more systematic in testing performance of VFS/VM before accepting
> > patches, and testing like we do. If that is desired, I can probably spare some
> > of Yura's time for that.
>
> The problem must be part of reiserfs because my system is totally unusable
> when writing to disk with reiserfs 3.6.10/kernel 2.4.0-test3-8 and it has
> been that way in all 2.4 kernels. I had ext2 on my partitions before I
> switched to reiserfs and ext2 was a LOT faster on both reads and writes.
>
Please describe the programs you are using, we don't see this with 3.6.11
(our latest patch against 2.4.0-test3)

-chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:16 EST