Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Jul 13 2000 - 15:56:23 EST

Next message: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: (OT) NTFS Util"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Multithreaded TCP/IP stack"
In reply to: Hans Reiser: "Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware"
Next in thread: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware"
Reply: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I hope you understand why I think that adding reiserfs is a small disturbance
> compared to continuing revisions of VFS.

The reiserfs concerns I have are more about doing it the right way for all
fs's. Linus call anyway.

"I sense a disturbance in the source"

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: (OT) NTFS Util"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Multithreaded TCP/IP stack"
In reply to: Hans Reiser: "Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware"
Next in thread: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware"
Reply: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:00:19 EST