Re: TO HELL WITH IT THEN......(re: disk-destroyer.c)

From: Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Date: Thu Jul 20 2000 - 21:29:06 EST

Next message: Neil Brown: "Re: [patch-2.4.0-test5-pre3] struct inode shortened"
Previous message: David Schwartz: "RE: Cache coherency... and locking"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "TO HELL WITH IT THEN......(re: disk-destroyer.c)"
Next in thread: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: TO HELL WITH IT THEN......(re: disk-destroyer.c)"
Reply: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: TO HELL WITH IT THEN......(re: disk-destroyer.c)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> The reason why you can not do this level of destruction in Microsoft is
> that it does not have a HOLE the size of a MAC TRUCK!

You can, just bit-bang the (ATA|SCSI|other) controller.

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Neil Brown: "Re: [patch-2.4.0-test5-pre3] struct inode shortened"
Previous message: David Schwartz: "RE: Cache coherency... and locking"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "TO HELL WITH IT THEN......(re: disk-destroyer.c)"
Next in thread: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: TO HELL WITH IT THEN......(re: disk-destroyer.c)"
Reply: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: TO HELL WITH IT THEN......(re: disk-destroyer.c)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 23 2000 - 21:00:14 EST