Re: ATA-6 Draft Proposal Changes for "vender-unique".

From: Matthew Jacob (mjacob@feral.com)
Date: Mon Jul 24 2000 - 16:44:38 EST


Hmm. Sounds good- can we get this on the t10 list as well?

On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote:

>
> Upon a more exact definintion, I will request a formal NCITS number.
>
> 1) All devices shall reject all vender-specific commands when the
> vender-unique enable is not set. In addition enabling any vender-specific
> commands shall not be done by anyone but the vender of the product.
>
> 2) The HOST portion of the reporting-logs will be defined as a a record to
> record the time and date of these vender-unique enable calls. This will
> be a write only and shall not earasable by any means. In addition the
> vender shall provide a signature the authenticates the approved access,
> and all other accesses may optionally provide a signature.
>
> Because of the lack in clarity and the rule that which (paraphrased)
> states: That which is not in the standard is not part of the standard.
>
> This has cause me grief and lack of sleep making some decision seem less
> than rational.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Andre Hedrick
> The
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:17 EST