On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> We *don't* do *everything* in userland. We just allow access to
> the raw side of the world from userland so that a program doesn't have
> to do worse things to try and get the same access. The way it currently
> is there is the possibility that a vendor wouldn't have to muck around
> in the kernel to be able to upgrade the flash.
Making that sort of thing available to userland is not a good idea, IMO.
Apart from anything else, I do NOT want to see Linux tools for upgrading
firmware etc. for exactly the same reasons I don't want to see Windows
ones: Why assume/require that I am running Linux or Windows?
A vendor supplied bootdisk is completely OS neutral, since the OS is out
of the equation. I could use that bootdisk whether my main OS is Linux,
NT, FreeBSD, Netware, whatever I want.
> This keeps the vendor specific *junk* out of the kernel and in
> userland.
I'd rather keep it out completely.
> The kernel provides a nice clean interface to devices which conform to
> the spec. Note that such raw access is, from what I can tell, part of
> the spec, just the specific data sent using it isn't specified in the
> spec and has been used by vendors to provide vendor-specific hooks,
> which reminds me of 'SCSI generic'...
It's dangerous - and the only legitimate use of this "feature" is one
which shouldn't be done from within Linux in the first place.
James.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:19 EST