Re: Direct access to hardware

From: James Sutherland (jas88@cam.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Jul 25 2000 - 10:51:26 EST


On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Stuart MacDonald wrote:

> Which is exactly the point. The hard drives should be checking for
> invalid ATA commands in hardware, right in the drive, preventing
> damage from bad commands. Putting a filter into the kernel is not
> the right fix.

As with some of the Intel CPU bugs, the problem is NOT "invalid ATA
commands" - it's a matter of VALID commands which are dangerous. FDIV on
early Pentiums isn't an invalid instruction - it just produces the wrong
results at times. So the SOFTWARE must do something to avoid this - either
that, or you need to replace the hardware, which isn't desirable. You do
something in the OS to prevent these problem commands being used.

James.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:19 EST