Re: [RFC][Long][Horror story] Mount flags

From: Andries Brouwer (aeb@veritas.com)
Date: Mon Jul 31 2000 - 04:49:11 EST


On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 07:09:35PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:

> On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Andries Brouwer wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 06:23:05PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
> >
> > > Moreover, we can't do anything about the 0xc0ed kludge
> >
> > Why not? If the first bit of flags is 1, check that the
> > first 16 bits are 0xc0ed. If not, decode the following
> > 15 bits.
>
> Andries, no offense, but IMO it just replaces a kludge with more elaborate
> one. Sorry. Rules like that _really_ look ugly. Yes, it will work. But try to
> describe the rules in a manpage and see if you will be able to look at it
> without a feeling that it's an overcomplicated kludge.

Description: "flags is a 31-bit flags word; the first bit must be zero".

This is not the time to introduce new mount syscalls.
There is no need. These top 15 bits are not even needed yet.

Andries

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:33 EST