Re: [patch?] Re: Do ramdisk exec's map direct to buffer cache?

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Wed Aug 02 2000 - 09:11:27 EST

Next message: Theodore Ts'o: "Re: linux kernel docs"
Previous message: sat: "Re: can I use u64 on an i386"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch?] Re: Do ramdisk exec's map direct to buffer cache?"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [patch?] Re: Do ramdisk exec's map direct to buffer cache?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk said:
> nbd over loopback deadlocks in user space under load. Its fine with a
> remote server not a local one.

Is this deadlock any easier to fix than the loopback device one?

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Theodore Ts'o: "Re: linux kernel docs"
Previous message: sat: "Re: can I use u64 on an i386"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch?] Re: Do ramdisk exec's map direct to buffer cache?"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [patch?] Re: Do ramdisk exec's map direct to buffer cache?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 07 2000 - 21:00:08 EST