Re: RFC: design for new VM

From: wingel@t1.ctrl-c.liu.se
Date: Tue Aug 08 2000 - 00:25:36 EST


dg@suse.com wrote:
[snip]
>and of course VMS is not the
>last word by any means, but the system was very tunable, and had specific
>explicit mechanisms to attain many of the goals of vm system.

I'm not sure if I like tunables. My feeling after playing around with
VMS for a few years is that it's next to impossible to get all these
tunables right. Having a tunable usually means "we can't get this right
so we'll just blame the user (admin) for using bad values". Of course
sometimes tunables are needed, but I'd like as few as possible, or they
should at least ble automatically managed unless the user sets them
explicitly.

   /Christer

-- 
"Just how much can I get away with and still go to heaven?"

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:14 EST