Re: hda status error w/ 2.2.16

From: Alex Buell (alex.buell@tahallah.clara.co.uk)
Date: Wed Aug 09 2000 - 03:46:42 EST

Next message: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: broken __IS_FLG() <linux/fs.h> in 2.4.0-test6-pre?"
Previous message: David Woodhouse: "Re: [patch?] Re: Do ramdisk exec's map direct to buffer cache?"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: hda status error w/ 2.2.16"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 18:00:37 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:

>> I was sitting in Pine, writing some e-mails when this happened.
>
>No, what was going on in the background.
>Playing Molly Hatchet, Flirting with Disaster! , heh?

Nothing except for a SETI process and all the usual daemons. I was
also in X11 (3.3.6).

I think this is probably related to the problems I've had in the past
with buffer corruption (which is still happening despite my efforts to
locate the fault - changed memory chips, changed power supply units to
no avail). Now I just put up with it and reboot.

Cheers,
Alex.

-- Bring on the music and lights!

http://www.tahallah.clara.co.uk

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: broken __IS_FLG() <linux/fs.h> in 2.4.0-test6-pre?"
Previous message: David Woodhouse: "Re: [patch?] Re: Do ramdisk exec's map direct to buffer cache?"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: hda status error w/ 2.2.16"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST