Lincoln Dale <ltd@interlink.com.au> writes:
> At 03:55 09/08/00, David Ford wrote:
> > > * SHM segments not always being detached and destroyed right ?
> >
> >Haven't seen this happen in a long time and I use shm a lot.
>
> what's your definition of "a long time".
>
> some development work that i've been doing against 2.4.0-test3-pre4
> shows that shm segments are most definitely lost and/or return to free
> verrrry slowly.
>
> (i'll be upgrading to test6-pre7 soon and if its still broken will advise)
Since the shm code was not changed for a long time (long time is since
Jun 2) please advise now!
I did not have _any_ complaints since my last patch to shm.
Greetings
Christoph
--- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST