Re: Definitions: from LKML FAQ

From: Matthew Wilcox (matthew@wil.cx)
Date: Wed Aug 09 2000 - 21:28:19 EST

Next message: Joe Pranevich: "Linux 2.4 - Possible Press Release (Revised)"
Previous message: Hans Reiser: "Re: Definitions"
In reply to: Michael Rothwell: "Re: Definitions: from LKML FAQ"
Next in thread: Michael Rothwell: "Re: Definitions: from LKML FAQ"
Reply: Michael Rothwell: "Re: Definitions: from LKML FAQ"
Reply: HA Quoc-Viet: ""ACPI is not safe for SMP""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 11:13:53PM -0400, Michael Rothwell wrote:
> freeze," despite being in "2.4.0-test-X" stage for months, and
> "2.3.99-pre-X" for nearly a year.

you keep repeating this misinformation, so I think it's worth correcting
you.

2.3.99pre1 : Tue Mar 14
2.4.0-test1: Thu May 25

(and Linus promptly went on holiday, so it may be more fair to start
counting 2.4.0-test from 2.4.0-test2: Fri Jun 23).

On Monday August 9th, 1999 -- one year ago today -- Linus released
2.3.13. that's a lot of revisions from .51 which was the final 2.3
before 2.3.99-pre.

-- Revolutions do not require corporate support.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Joe Pranevich: "Linux 2.4 - Possible Press Release (Revised)"
Previous message: Hans Reiser: "Re: Definitions"
In reply to: Michael Rothwell: "Re: Definitions: from LKML FAQ"
Next in thread: Michael Rothwell: "Re: Definitions: from LKML FAQ"
Reply: Michael Rothwell: "Re: Definitions: from LKML FAQ"
Reply: HA Quoc-Viet: ""ACPI is not safe for SMP""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:20 EST