Jamie Lokier wrote:
>
> Michael Rothwell wrote:
> > Perhaps the real problem isn't the "feature freeze" but the numbering --
> > maybe we should still be in the "2.3.xxx" pre-nothing stage currently. Or
> > the FAQ needs to be updated.
>
> Indeed, now that LINUX_VERSION_CODE has the value 0x20400 for all
> kernels over the last few months, it's impossible to write modules that
> will compile on all of them :-(
Is that really a big deal? Its a test series which will have a stable
interface once 2.4.0 proper is released.
My own pet peeve is ppl avoiding the KERNEL_VERSION() macro when doing
LINUX_VERSION_CODE tests. Makes each test a bit more readable.
Jeff
-- Jeff Garzik | Building 1024 | Andre the Giant has a posse. MandrakeSoft, Inc. |- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST