Re: Changes

From: Ingo Oeser (ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de)
Date: Thu Aug 10 2000 - 10:05:16 EST


On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 05:42:05PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> Changes says modutils 2.3.13 and it *was* patched at the same time that
> the modules_install change went in, I did it. You must run modutils
> 2.3.13 for the new modules structure; 2.3.14 is not required for
> modules_install. 2.3.14 fixes a problem with distributions which have
> path[xxx]=/lib/modules/`uname -r`
> in modules.conf. So the kernel does not need modutils 2.3.14, only
> people with incorrectly set parameter files. Changes is right.

Are you also responsible for this stupid depmod call?

This prevents me from compiling the kernel on our CPU-Servers
(which are like Dual Xeon with 800MHz, 1GB and such, but I'm no
root at these) and do it at home instead (Pentium 150, 64MB).

Many thanks, it adds about an hour of waiting :-(

Hope this stupid thing will be patched out within
the test7-cycle, because *now* I know, why distris never provide
a standard kernel to boot from :-(

The other things are perfectly ok and _really_ make sense ;-)

Regards

Ingo Oeser

-- 
Feel the power of the penguin - run linux@your.pc
<esc>:x

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:22 EST