Re: filesystem in a blackbox ?

• Next message: Phillips, Mike: "RE: [PATCH] olympic.c: fixes to olympic_scan"
• Previous message: Pierre Rousselet: "Re: 2.4.0-test6 devfs"
• In reply to: wu_yb: "filesystem in a blackbox ?"
• Next in thread: Chris Mason: "Re: filesystem in a blackbox ?"
• Reply: Chris Mason: "Re: filesystem in a blackbox ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

wu_yb@sina.com said:
> I made a linux-router box without monitor or keyboard. When it
> running, it write logs to HD. If I turn off the box, the filesystem
> maybe be damaged and can't boot again.

> Any way to keep it's filesystem sync ?

Use a journalling filesystem.

For a box like that, you probably want to use flash anyway. The current
version of JFFS should be mostly ready for production use, especially if
it's not got much load. It's in 2.4.0-test6 and also available for 2.2
and 2.0.

--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Phillips, Mike: "RE: [PATCH] olympic.c: fixes to olympic_scan"
• Previous message: Pierre Rousselet: "Re: 2.4.0-test6 devfs"
• In reply to: wu_yb: "filesystem in a blackbox ?"
• Next in thread: Chris Mason: "Re: filesystem in a blackbox ?"
• Reply: Chris Mason: "Re: filesystem in a blackbox ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:23 EST