Re: lock_kernel() & kmalloc - evil together?

From: Tigran Aivazian (tigran@veritas.com)
Date: Fri Aug 11 2000 - 14:29:39 EST


On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> >
> > Is there a counter of some type in Linux I could check to detect this
> > easily?
>
> It's called
>
> in_interrupt()
>
> in Linux - it's not a single counter, as hard interrupts and soft
> interrupts are counted separately, but it gives you the information you
> want (whether you're in an interrupt or not).

with one documented "gotcha", though - it returns false positive if you
have interrupts disabled. According to Rusty Russel's Unreliable Guide to
Locking, page 7.

Regards,
Tigran

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:25 EST