"Theodore Y. Ts'o" wrote:
> Is this enough to convince you that trying to emulate Extended
> Attributes in terms of Named Streams is terminally broken?!?
No.
> The other question which this of course raises is what happens if a
> filesystem has *both* named streams and extended attributes? And in
> fact, NTFSv5 (shipped with the W2K bug) does in fact have both. This
> should hopefully prove to you that Extended Attributes and Named Streams
> are fundamentally different.
Please explain a little better.
-M
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:33 EST