This whole SCO thing is overrated. I worked on the Unixware code base
at Novell, and it's
putrid in comparison to Linux. It's got a lot of good apps, but so does
Linux. This kind of tripe propaganda is what the "cult" followers of
Unixware are good at. They lost @ $ 38,000,000 dollars each year at
Novell ramming UnixWare down our throats and pissing of our customers --
Novell finally cut rheir losses and sold it. Don't get me wrong, it's
decent Unix stuff, but Linux is tons better as a general purpose PC
Unix. Just remember, Caldera is a LINUX company -- they will take the
best of both, and use it to improve Linux ....
Joerg Pommnitz wrote:
> Hi Lists,
> The Register has an article about the Linux compatibility layer
> for Unixware.
> The article claims
> quote> SCO's Juergen Kienhoefer tells us that by mapping clone processes
> quote> directly onto UnixWare's native threads, huge performance gains
> quote> can be realised. "Basically thread creation is about a thousand
> quote> times faster than on native Linux," he said. The performance boost
> quote> could particularly benefit applications such as Domino, according
> quote> Kienhoefer.
> Somehow I doubt this. I could believe that the glibc pthread layer
> causes a lot of overhead for the thread creation, but I cannot
> imagine that they get clone 1000 times faster than the Linux kernel.
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to email@example.com
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 23 2000 - 21:00:09 EST