Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than onnative

• Next message: Sander Dol: "scsi errors on CD change"
• Previous message: Giuliano Pochini: "ll_rw_blk.c fails to merge requests. Help!"
• In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than onnative"
• Next in thread: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than onnative"
• Reply: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than onnative"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> The users do not distingush between kernel thread and thread. They just
> want a thread and assume it is lightweight. Linux effectively gives them
> only heavy threads currently, which they usually do not need.

So take this to glibc-bugs

I belive the phrase we use over here is 'preaching to the converted'

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Sander Dol: "scsi errors on CD change"
• Previous message: Giuliano Pochini: "ll_rw_blk.c fails to merge requests. Help!"
• In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than onnative"
• Next in thread: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than onnative"
• Reply: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than onnative"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 23 2000 - 21:00:10 EST