On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 11:21:18AM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 08:17:19PM -0600, yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:
> > implementation will act as if the original exec'd program is the process
> > and does all signal handling. This process may use pthread_kill
> > to pass signals on to threads, but there is no interaction between
>
> There are large security considerations. A process must be KILL and
> STOPable, no matter wether it uses threads or not. every other semantics
> would be a security nightmare (or make threads a root-only interface).
That's why pthreads as a special library or executable type seems best.
Otherwise, there seems room in the POSIX spec to wriggle out of the STOP
requirement.
-- --------------------------------------------------------- Victor Yodaiken Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company. www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:21 EST