On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 03:23:43PM +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Your patch does not seem correct to me. IMO you should rather be
> calling nlm_release_file() in both cases where you applied
> 'put_file()'.
No. In the first of two cases, lockd will call nlm_release_file()
on its own when the function returns. In the second case, we're being
called from inside nlm_traverse_files(), which holds a lock on the file
table -- nlm_release_file() would wait forever.
-- Michael "Tired" Riepe <Michael.Riepe@stud.uni-hannover.de> "All I wanna do is have a little fun before I die" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:28 EST