dmaas@dcine.com (Dan Maas) wrote on 02.09.00 in <020d01c014a9$f48d3fa0$0701a8c0@morph>:
> When people think of "multithreading," often they are just looking for a way
> to extract more concurrency from their machine. You want all these
> independent parts to be working on your task simultaneously. There are many
> different mechanisms for achieveing this. Here we go...
[...]
> In summary, when "multithreading" floats into your mind, think
> "concurrency." Think very carefully about how you might simultaneously
Let me see if I get this right.
Some people say "threading" when they mean "performance", so we all should
think "performance" when we hear "threading"?
Why am I not impressed by that logic?
MfG Kai
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:13 EST