On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
> > Comments? Basically the "grab_cache_page()" would be a "read_cache_page()"
> > instead with all the wait-on-page etc stuff.
> Works for me. However, that way it looks like a fs/buffer.c fodder.
> Mind if I just call it block_zero_page(page, from, to) and export it?
Not at all. In fact, I'd prefer it that way, because this same thing is
obviously going to be useful for any other block filesystem with the same
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:15 EST