In message <39B17797.70EA7227@timpanogas.com>, "Jeff V. Merkey"
writes:
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>
>
> Jes Sorensen wrote:
> >
>
> > Yeah I bet NT also has a wonderful graphical click click wush wush
> > environment for it that allows you to spend all your time `improving'
> > your rsi instead of getting real work done. Have you ever looked at NT
> > device driver code? I have, it's not pretty at all so I can understand
> > why you need all these tools.
>
>
> The kernel debugger in NT is text based and runs remotely only. It's
> very powerful and has facilties built in for debugging nested page
> faults and structured exceptions, SMP deadlocks, conditional
> breakpoints, and tons of other stuff not in Linux. Since Linux doesn't
> even support structured exception handling, it's not even a fair
> comparison between the two.
If NTs debugger is so good then why is NT so buggy? Microsoft
doesn't know how to use it?
Bob
-- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bob Taylor Email: brtaylor@inreach.com | |---------------------------------------------------------------| | Like the ad says, at 300 dpi you can tell she's wearing a | | swimsuit. At 600 dpi you can tell it's wet. At 1200 dpi you | | can tell it's painted on. I suppose at 2400 dpi you can tell | | if the paint is giving her a rash. (So says Joshua R. Poulson)| +---------------------------------------------------------------+- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:15 EST