Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre2 compile fails at smbfs

• Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM"
• Previous message: Horst von Brand: "Re: What the Heck? [Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ari Pollak <compwiz@bigfoot.com> said:
> Building 2.4.0-test8-pre2 fails with smbfs enabled:

Ditto coda as module:

/usr/src/build/GCC/build-gcc-20000903/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/src/build/GCC/build-gcc-20000903/gcc/ -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -fno-strict-aliasing -DMODULE -c -o upcall.o upcall.c

[Much spam about ", ##" in macros]

upcall.c: In function `coda_waitfor_upcall':
upcall.c:637: structure has no member named `signal'
upcall.c:637: structure has no member named `signal'
upcall.c:638: structure has no member named `signal'
upcall.c:638: structure has no member named `signal'
upcall.c:638: Tree check: expected class 't', have 'x' (error_mark)
upcall.c:638: Internal compiler error in expand_inline_function, at integrate.c:682
Please submit a full bug report.

[Will do]

-- 
Horst von Brand                             vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl
Casilla 9G, Vin~a del Mar, Chile                               +56 32 672616
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM"
• Previous message: Horst von Brand: "Re: What the Heck? [Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:16 EST