Re: Should O_NONBLOCK be copied from listening socket to accepting socket?

From: Chris Evans (chris@scary.beasts.org)
Date: Mon Sep 04 2000 - 17:38:32 EST


On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> > Is it required that the O_NONBLOCK flag be copied from a listening
> > socket to an accepted socket? Dan Bernstein believes this is a bug.
>
> My posix 1003.1g draft leaves it undefined. It is possible that
> SuS clarifies this. Unless he can cite a SuS version that has clarified this
> I believe its like the SIGIO case - inheritance is platform specific.

Well, in our own manpages

man 7 socket

       It is possible to do non-blocking IO on sockets by setting
       the O_NONBLOCK flag on a socket file descriptor using
       fcntl(2). O_NONBLOCK is inherited through an accept.

Cheers
Chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:20 EST