Re: Should O_NONBLOCK be copied from listening socket to accepting

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Sep 04 2000 - 18:59:41 EST

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS for Linux"
Previous message: Nathan Myers: "[unpatch] ide cd-audio broken in 2.2.17preN (N >= 2)"
In reply to: Chris Evans: "Re: Should O_NONBLOCK be copied from listening socket to accepting socket?"
Next in thread: Herbert Xu: "Re: Should O_NONBLOCK be copied from listening socket to accepting socket?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Well, in our own manpages
>
> man 7 socket
>
> It is possible to do non-blocking IO on sockets by setting
> the O_NONBLOCK flag on a socket file descriptor using
> fcntl(2). O_NONBLOCK is inherited through an accept.

So the man page is wrong ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS for Linux"
Previous message: Nathan Myers: "[unpatch] ide cd-audio broken in 2.2.17preN (N >= 2)"
In reply to: Chris Evans: "Re: Should O_NONBLOCK be copied from listening socket to accepting socket?"
Next in thread: Herbert Xu: "Re: Should O_NONBLOCK be copied from listening socket to accepting socket?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:20 EST