Eric Buddington wrote:
> David Ford,
> I seek your help posting to linux-kernel. Would you kindly forward this if
> indeed firstname.lastname@example.org is still the right address?
> I am attempting to report a Linux bug, as you will see below. I get 'user
> unknown' with no explanation (not obviously ORBS-related) whether sending
> from my university account (blacklisted), my dial-up IP, or my ISP's relay
> host (neither ORBS-listed). Trying to subscribe via
> Majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu gives the same 'user unknown'.
> Thanks for your help, if you're willing.
> ----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@mx1.buf.adelphia.net> -----
> Envelope-to: email@example.com
> Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 17:32:23 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@mx1.buf.adelphia.net>
> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
> The original message was received at Wed, 6 Sep 2000 17:32:08 -0400 (EDT)
> from email@example.com [126.96.36.199]
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> (reason: 550 <firstname.lastname@example.org>... User unknown)
> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> ... while talking to vger.rutgers.edu.:
> >>> RCPT To:<email@example.com>
> <<< 550 <firstname.lastname@example.org>... User unknown
> 550 5.1.1 <email@example.com>... User unknown
> Reporting-MTA: dns; mx1.buf.adelphia.net
> Received-From-MTA: DNS; ma-northadams1-415.nad.adelphia.net
> Arrival-Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 17:32:08 -0400 (EDT)
> Final-Recipient: RFC822; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.1.1
> Remote-MTA: DNS; vger.rutgers.edu
> Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 <email@example.com>... User unknown
> Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 17:32:23 -0400 (EDT)
> Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 17:34:10 -0400
> From: Eric Buddington <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: 2.4.0-test7 reboots after uncompress on 486SX
> Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
> Organization: ECS Labs
> X-Eric-Conspiracy: there is no conspiracy
> 486 SX/25 trying to run Linux 2.4.0-test7, no patches. Compiled for
> nfs-root with most things as modules.
> The kernel loads (via GRUB) and uncompresses itself, then immediately
> reboots. No boot messages show up after the uncompressing message.
> I tried compiling for i386 and i486. Both showed his behavior.
> My Debian 2.2.15 kernel boots as expected on this machine.
> ----- End forwarded message -----
-- "The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was 'committed'."
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:28 EST