Re: Is it OK to release non-GPL network driver with source?

• Next message: Marty Fouts: "RE: Scalability Efforts"
• Previous message: Richard Henderson: "Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was"
• In reply to: Dave Allen: "Is it OK to release non-GPL network driver with source?"
• Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Is it OK to release non-GPL network driver with source?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> If indeed this is a violation of the GPL, is there any way around this
> by releasing only the source code (even though it isn't GPL'd)? I
> mean, the compiled binary code does contain GPL'd code, but the source
> code does not. Is it OK to distribute this?
>
> So, I'm asking the experts here for opinions or insights.

Wrong list. Seriously. If you want to know about copyright law as your company
lawyer.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Marty Fouts: "RE: Scalability Efforts"
• Previous message: Richard Henderson: "Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was"
• In reply to: Dave Allen: "Is it OK to release non-GPL network driver with source?"
• Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Is it OK to release non-GPL network driver with source?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 07 2000 - 21:00:31 EST