On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Elmer Joandi wrote:
> 1. First - it mounted a ufs but showed nothing.... long time to find the
> 44bsd senseless
> option.
Sigh... Would you prefer six-seven fs types? You see, 4.4 UFS != Slowlaris
UFS. And no, FreeBSD implementation is not happy with it either.
> 2. ok, linux up&running, samba and MS Windows Nx100MB profiles copying by few
> users.
> After a while - MS tells me : media is read-only.... what a hell.
> going to command line - the partition IS now readonly....
Internal error in driver => remount read-only (alternatives: warn and keep
going; just panic). How about syslog?
> 3. -o remount,rw : disk full (not really)
... well, doh - basically you've been in panic() situation and you wonder
that part of kernel that was responsible is for fsckup is, well, fscked
up?
> It would be nice, if for 2.4 there would be mandatory printk for expermiental
printk is a overkill, but config _does_ keep r/w UFS under "exeprimental"
(2.4 at least)
> and non-production modules.
> So after a year someone would not try to use that stuff on production system.
Well, the better way is to fix the bloody thing...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 21:00:18 EST