Shaw Starr repored on xpert@xfree86.org that a fresh checkout of 4.01d and fresh
build of X resulted in a fixed/working shm w/ X.
-d
safemode wrote:
> When in doubt. . Blame it on the biggest piece of crap around .. X. One can
> say using a cvs of X is the cause of this by somehow i doubt it would matter. X
> needs a sane make system and i'll bet 10:1 that it's the root of this shm usage.
> But it should not be crashing the OS ...which does occur since i just went down a
> couple minutes ago. Right now it's increasing 1 segment a second it seems. it's
> at 1200 now and i give it about 30 more minutes before i crash again. I'm gonna
> run this on the test8-vm3 patched kernel i had before that was VERY good except
> for that deadlock problem that caused me to crash after 7 days. If the shm usage
> is insane on that then i'll believe it is X's fault. be back with the results
> in a few minutes.
--
"There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are
virtue and talents", Thomas Jefferson [1742-1826], 3rd US President
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 21:00:29 EST