Munging reply-to headers etc. (was: Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM)

From: Henrik Størner (henrik@storner.dk)
Date: Sat Sep 23 2000 - 14:03:45 EST

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: interrupt magic"
Previous message: David Ford: "Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
In reply to: safemode: "Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
Next in thread: David Ford: "[OT] lkml reply-to header (was: Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In <39CCF076.A14DBE9@voicenet.com> safemode <safemode@voicenet.com> writes:

[mega snip]

See http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html for all of the
good reasons why the vger lists behave just the way they should.

-- 
Henrik Storner      | "Crackers thrive on code secrecy. Cockcroaches breed 
<henrik@storner.dk> |  in the dark. It's time to let the sunlight in."
                    |  
                    |          Eric S. Raymond, re. the Frontpage backdoor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: interrupt magic"
Previous message: David Ford: "Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
In reply to: safemode: "Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
Next in thread: David Ford: "[OT] lkml reply-to header (was: Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 21:00:29 EST