Re: more testing on 2.4.0-t9p[456] VM deadlocks

From: Marcelo Tosatti (marcelo@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Mon Sep 25 2000 - 06:55:37 EST

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: PATCH 2.2.18.9: Backport /proc/pci from 2.4.x to 2.2.x"
Previous message: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz: "Re: PATCH 2.2.18.9: Backport /proc/pci from 2.4.x to 2.2.x"
In reply to: Martin Diehl: "Re: more testing on 2.4.0-t9p[456] VM deadlocks"
Next in thread: Martin Diehl: "Re: more testing on 2.4.0-t9p[456] VM deadlocks"
Reply: Martin Diehl: "Re: more testing on 2.4.0-t9p[456] VM deadlocks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Martin Diehl wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Martin Diehl wrote:
>
> > PS: vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 not yet tested - will do later.
>
> Hi - done now:
>
> using 2.4.0-t9p6 + vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 I ended up with the box
> deadlocked again! Was "make bzImage" on UP booted with mem=8M.

There is a known deadlock with Ingo's patch.

I'm attaching a patch which should fix it. (on top of
vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2)

TEXT/PLAIN attachment: vmfixes-B2-deadlock.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: PATCH 2.2.18.9: Backport /proc/pci from 2.4.x to 2.2.x"
Previous message: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz: "Re: PATCH 2.2.18.9: Backport /proc/pci from 2.4.x to 2.2.x"
In reply to: Martin Diehl: "Re: more testing on 2.4.0-t9p[456] VM deadlocks"
Next in thread: Martin Diehl: "Re: more testing on 2.4.0-t9p[456] VM deadlocks"
Reply: Martin Diehl: "Re: more testing on 2.4.0-t9p[456] VM deadlocks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:14 EST