Re: [PATCH] eepro 0.12c

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Sep 26 2000 - 11:08:12 EST

Next message: Horst von Brand: "Re: Can't compile linus 2.2.17 with latest gcc due to checksum.S"
Previous message: Jan Niehusmann: "Re: mount -t bind gone?"
In reply to: Jes Sorensen: "Re: [PATCH] eepro 0.12c"
Next in thread: Zbigniew Chyla: "Re: [PATCH] eepro 0.12c"
Reply: Zbigniew Chyla: "Re: [PATCH] eepro 0.12c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Alan> unsigned is always explicitly integer.
> And recent gcc's complain over it.

So file a gcc bug ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Horst von Brand: "Re: Can't compile linus 2.2.17 with latest gcc due to checksum.S"
Previous message: Jan Niehusmann: "Re: mount -t bind gone?"
In reply to: Jes Sorensen: "Re: [PATCH] eepro 0.12c"
Next in thread: Zbigniew Chyla: "Re: [PATCH] eepro 0.12c"
Reply: Zbigniew Chyla: "Re: [PATCH] eepro 0.12c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:18 EST