On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> > > OO is indeed != C++. But since it's a relative if C, it's the most
> > > suitable option to use in the kernel.
> >
> > What's wrong with C itself?
>
> Nothing. What I was saying if you want some OO language in the kernel, C++
> is the only option I guess. Mixing languages is a pain..
There is no such thing as "OO language". There is OO style and there are
ways to use it when you are writing in almost any language. And OO in C is
not harder than OO in C++, provided that you are not trying to write in
C++ and translate line-by-line into C.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:22 EST