Re: [PATCH] esssolo1.c: get rid of check_region

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Sep 29 2000 - 04:13:08 EST

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] esssolo1.c: get rid of check_region"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] esssolo1.c: get rid of check_region"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] esssolo1.c: get rid of check_region"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] esssolo1.c: get rid of check_region"
Reply: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] esssolo1.c: get rid of check_region"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> In solo1_probe, an FM interface is registered.
>
> So, IMHO there is a bug somewhere... Why register an FM interface in
> probe, and then check_region for another FM driver in _open? Is this
> intentional or really a bug?

The I/O port range is only activated in open

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] esssolo1.c: get rid of check_region"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] esssolo1.c: get rid of check_region"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] esssolo1.c: get rid of check_region"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] esssolo1.c: get rid of check_region"
Reply: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] esssolo1.c: get rid of check_region"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:24 EST