Re: [RFC] Imminent death of /proc/locks predicted; film at 11

• Next message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: [RFC] Imminent death of /proc/locks predicted; film at 11"
• Previous message: Ben Collins: "Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux 2.2.18pre13"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [RFC] Imminent death of /proc/locks predicted; film at 11"
• Next in thread: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: [RFC] Imminent death of /proc/locks predicted; film at 11"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> If it makes the code far cleaner then I have no objection. If we can do a
> simple (different format even) /proc/locks to replace it that scores double
> points ;)

Additional bonus points for changing the name. /proc/fs/locks might be a
good variant...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: [RFC] Imminent death of /proc/locks predicted; film at 11"
• Previous message: Ben Collins: "Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux 2.2.18pre13"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [RFC] Imminent death of /proc/locks predicted; film at 11"
• Next in thread: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: [RFC] Imminent death of /proc/locks predicted; film at 11"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:28 EST