Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux 2.2.18pre13

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@caldera.de)
Date: Sat Sep 30 2000 - 18:55:03 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [RFC] Imminent death of /proc/locks predicted; film at 11"
In reply to: Ben Collins: "Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux 2.2.18pre13"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux 2.2.18pre13"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux 2.2.18pre13"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> wrote:
> Isn't this completely broken? I mean, it wont detect the others at all. It
> will leave CC="" if gcc272 or kgcc are there.

Yes. Sorry I' too selfish today ;) Your version seems more accurate to me.

Christoph

-- 
Always remember that you are unique.  Just like everyone else.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [RFC] Imminent death of /proc/locks predicted; film at 11"
In reply to: Ben Collins: "Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux 2.2.18pre13"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux 2.2.18pre13"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux 2.2.18pre13"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:28 EST