On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Handling out-of-memory in a clean and predictable way is the
> next thing on the feature list. I'll add it RSN (I'm reasonably
> sure now that the current VM features are stable ... time for
> OOM handling).
Stable is good. But before moving on, wouldn't it be nice to have some
test8 vs. test9 vs. 2.2.14 (or so) benchmarks, to confirm it was worth the
pain of a whole pre-patch series weeding out deadlocks?
Cheers
Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 07 2000 - 21:00:14 EST