Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Mon Oct 09 2000 - 23:11:11 EST

Next message: Frank de Lange: "Re: 2.4.0-test9 + Winchip2/2A processor family == hang on boot"
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
In reply to: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:21:48 +0200
From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@lina.inka.de>

We will see who feels responsible for adding it to the kernel
source. Alexey? Andi? Davem? Alan?

I have applied the fix, and will send it to Linus.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Frank de Lange: "Re: 2.4.0-test9 + Winchip2/2A processor family == hang on boot"
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
In reply to: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 15 2000 - 21:00:14 EST