Re: K7 on SD11 and 2.2.17: memory not detected

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Oct 11 2000 - 17:06:32 EST


> 2.2.18-pre with good results on Thinkpad 600x. No adverse consequencies
> (memory is reported correctly, suspend/hibernate work fine). I also had
> a chance to use it on several big SMP and UP servers (where e801 memory
> reporting works fine) Intel, Compaqs and IBM. No adverse consequencies
> either. What do you say?

Until every 2.4.0 doesnt boot case has been accounted for (within reason anyway)
no. Wrong mem sizing returns that are not caught are a great way to take out
your entire root fs

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 15 2000 - 21:00:20 EST